Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: : testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data

Baranzini, Andrea (Haute école de gestion de Genève, HES-SO // Haute Ecole Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale) ; Carattini, Stefano (Haute école de gestion de Genève, HES-SO // Haute Ecole Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale ; Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment and ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE))

This paper analyzes the drivers of carbon taxes acceptability with survey data and a randomized labeling treatment. Based on a sample of more than 300 individuals, it assesses the effect on acceptability of specific policy designs and individuals’ perceptions of carbon taxes advantages and disadvantages. We find that the lack of perception of primary and ancillary benefits is one of the main barriers to the acceptability of carbon taxes. In addition, policy design matters for acceptability and in particular earmarking fiscal revenues for environmental purposes can lead to larger support. We also find an effect of labeling, comparing the wording ‘‘climate contribution’’ with ‘‘carbon tax’’. We argue that proper policy design coupled with effective communication on the effects of carbon taxes may lead to a substantial improvement in acceptability


Mots-clés:
Type d'article:
scientifique
Ecole:
HEG-GE
Institut:
Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Gestion
Classification:
Économie/gestion
Date:
2017
Pagination:
31 p.
Titre du document hôte:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Numérotation (vol. no.):
2017, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 197–227
DOI:
ISSN:
1867-383X
Le document apparaît dans:



 Notice créée le 2016-04-20, modifiée le 2017-09-09

Fichiers:
Télécharger le document
PDF

Évaluer ce document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Pas encore évalué)